At Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:07:46 -0700, Henry Sinnreich wrote: > > Please help me understand: > > > The chairs called for consensus on the question "Should we ask that > > protocols developed allow HIP to be a customer of the P2Psip service, > > within the constraints of the charter?" There was no opposition. > > Since P2P SIP would run over HIP, the customer is P2P SIP, not the other way > round as in the above. Just as SIP, RTP, etc. are customers of IP. > > Was this a typo?
No. As Bruce indicated in a previous message, HIP needs a rendezvous service, and a generic P2P overlay like RELOAD can provide such a service. In that respect, HIP would be a client of RELOAD, even if RELOAD itself ran over ordinary IP. -Ekr _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
