Because it is not a session initiation protocol! Keith
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry Sinnreich > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:56 AM > To: Cullen Jennings; P2PSIP WG > Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Protcol Name > > How about P2P SIP? > > Henry > > > On 7/16/08 12:05 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The name reload just sort of happened for historical reasons and I > > think the WG should consider what name they want. At some > level, any > > name works, at another level it is somewhat relevant. Ideal a name > > would be easy to remember and say, have some connotation of peer to > > peer, and be a name folks liked. > > > > Any thoughts on a new name? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > P2PSIP mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
