> Because it is not a session initiation protocol! Please help me understand then why SIP is in the WG name.
Does this imply acceptance of the notion that it will serve for any other purpose, such as content distribution and games?y Henry On 7/17/08 5:14 AM, "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because it is not a session initiation protocol! > > Keith > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry Sinnreich >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:56 AM >> To: Cullen Jennings; P2PSIP WG >> Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Protcol Name >> >> How about P2P SIP? >> >> Henry >> >> >> On 7/16/08 12:05 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> The name reload just sort of happened for historical reasons and I >>> think the WG should consider what name they want. At some >> level, any >>> name works, at another level it is somewhat relevant. Ideal a name >>> would be easy to remember and say, have some connotation of peer to >>> peer, and be a name folks liked. >>> >>> Any thoughts on a new name? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> P2PSIP mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip >> >> _______________________________________________ >> P2PSIP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip >> _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
