How about peer-to-peer location service? Victor
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:14 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because it is not a session initiation protocol! > > Keith > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henry Sinnreich >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:56 AM >> To: Cullen Jennings; P2PSIP WG >> Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Protcol Name >> >> How about P2P SIP? >> >> Henry >> >> >> On 7/16/08 12:05 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> > The name reload just sort of happened for historical reasons and I >> > think the WG should consider what name they want. At some >> level, any >> > name works, at another level it is somewhat relevant. Ideal a name >> > would be easy to remember and say, have some connotation of peer to >> > peer, and be a name folks liked. >> > >> > Any thoughts on a new name? >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > P2PSIP mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip >> >> _______________________________________________ >> P2PSIP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip >> > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > -- Victor Pascual Ávila _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
