Currently RELOAD Requires that the Node-Ids be cryptographically random, which precludes this technique.
It's not clear to me why it's desirable for nodes which are geographically close to be close in the overlay topology.y -Ekr At Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:26:56 +0100, Xianghan Zheng wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (7bit)>] > Hello, > Is someone considering the mapping between the P2PSIP ID and physical > location. I think it is necessary to think about it although it is not > trivial and might cause some security problem. > > In the draft > "http://www.p2psip.org/drafts/draft-licanhuang-p2psip-subsetresourcelocation-00.txt";, > > However, the peer ID is formed as domain name. Is that conflict with the > concept that the ID should 128/160 bit integer? Is it possible that > each peer in one domain assigned similar identity? Any suggestions? > Thank you. > > Best Regards, > Xianghan Zheng > > > > [2 xianghan_zheng.vcf <text/x-vcard; utf-8 (base64)>] > begin:vcard > fn:Xianghan Zheng > n:Zheng;Xianghan > org:;Information and Communication Technology > adr:;;;Grimstad;;4879;Grimstad > title:PHD Studnet > tel;work:+47 3725 3441 > tel;cell:+47 91664693 > version:2.1 > end:vcard > > [3 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>] > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
