Hi Ekr,

> 
> It's not clear to me why it's desirable for nodes which are
> geographically close to be close in the overlay topology.y
> 
> -Ekr

P2P networks are teemed with dynamic nodes. When a peer leaves the overlay, it 
will transfer the stored resource records to a node which has a close node ID. 
From the perspective of an ISP's network, making P2PSIP node IDs with proximity 
property will reduce the network hops when data transfer happens. 

Besides that, I think overlay maintenance messages will also take less network 
hops if most neighbors have close node IDs. If node ID has proximity property, 
it will help for the peer selection when there are a list of peers providing 
the same resource.

I think we can find some papers describing the proximity for DHTs. I agree with 
Bruce that there are many considerations when assigning node id.

Best Regards,
Song Haibin


> 
> At Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:26:56 +0100,
> Xianghan Zheng wrote:
> > 
> > [1  <text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (7bit)>]
> > Hello,
> > Is someone considering the mapping between the P2PSIP ID and 
> physical 
> > location. I think it is necessary to think about it although it 
> is not 
> > trivial and might cause some security problem. 
> > 
> > In the draft 
> > "http://www.p2psip.org/drafts/draft-licanhuang-p2psip-
> subsetresourcelocation-00.txt", 
> > However, the peer ID is formed as domain name. Is that conflict 
> with the 
> > concept that the ID should 128/160 bit integer?  Is it possible 
> that 
> > each peer in one domain assigned  similar identity? Any 
> suggestions? 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Xianghan Zheng 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [2 xianghan_zheng.vcf <text/x-vcard; utf-8 (base64)>]
> > begin:vcard
> > fn:Xianghan Zheng
> > n:Zheng;Xianghan
> > org:;Information and Communication Technology
> > adr:;;;Grimstad;;4879;Grimstad
> > title:PHD Studnet
> > tel;work:+47 3725 3441
> > tel;cell:+47 91664693
> > version:2.1
> > end:vcard
> > 
> > [3  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> > _______________________________________________
> > P2PSIP mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
> _______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
> 
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to