Well, I'm one of those " Alto guys ". Alto will answer queries about proximity, but the question of randomness of node IDs is well outside Alto's scope. This working group will have to decide whether, as I suspect, randomness of node IDs is an important property to preserve.

Bruce
On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:13 AM, songhaibin 64081 wrote:

Bruce,

I agree with you that pastry has proximity property, and can achieve efficent routing. But for leafset, peer must choose leafset nodes that have closest IDs with it. It doesn't have a list of candidate peers to choose from as the routing table entries do. SO, by randomly assigned IDs, it will make the resource records mainternance between leafset nodes(when join or leave, or replicate happens often) not efficient because they waste the network hops.

If node IDs have network proximity property, it will make the routing message which gets closer and closer to the destination ID(e.g. Chord or Pastry), also gets closer and closer to the destination node in the network topology. It is a nature effect.

We could discuss with the ALTO guys and see what in their mind.

I think we should allow different options for node id assignment according to different scenarios.

my two cents
Song Haibin


----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Davie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2008 11:39 pm
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP ID and physical location
To: songhaibin 64081 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: P2PSIP WG <[email protected]>

Song,
it is certainly true that proximity is often used in DHTs, but
not, as
far as I know, for the assignment of node IDs. It is used, for
example, to select among many possible candidate nodes for
inclusion
in the routing table. But, as others have already said, the
randomness
of note IDs is important for the security and robustness of a DHT.
You
can have efficient routing without giving up the randomness of
note ID
assignment. See, for example, Pastry.
http://www.freepastry.org/pubs.htm
Bruce Davie
On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:11 AM, songhaibin 64081 wrote:

Hi Ekr,


It's not clear to me why it's desirable for nodes which are
geographically close to be close in the overlay topology.y

-Ekr

P2P networks are teemed with dynamic nodes. When a peer leaves
the
overlay, it will transfer the stored resource records to a node
which has a close node ID. From the perspective of an ISP's
network,
making P2PSIP node IDs with proximity property will reduce the
network hops when data transfer happens.

Besides that, I think overlay maintenance messages will also
take
less network hops if most neighbors have close node IDs. If node
ID
has proximity property, it will help for the peer selection when

there are a list of peers providing the same resource.

I think we can find some papers describing the proximity for
DHTs. I
agree with Bruce that there are many considerations when
assigning
node id.

Best Regards,
Song Haibin



At Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:26:56 +0100,
Xianghan Zheng wrote:

[1  <text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (7bit)>]
Hello,
Is someone considering the mapping between the P2PSIP ID and
physical
location. I think it is necessary to think about it although it
is not
trivial and might cause some security problem.

In the draft
"http://www.p2psip.org/drafts/draft-licanhuang-p2psip-
subsetresourcelocation-00.txt",
However, the peer ID is formed as domain name. Is that conflict
with the
concept that the ID should 128/160 bit integer?  Is it possible
that
each peer in one domain assigned  similar identity? Any
suggestions?
Thank you.

Best Regards,
Xianghan Zheng



[2 xianghan_zheng.vcf <text/x-vcard; utf-8 (base64)>]
begin:vcard
fn:Xianghan Zheng
n:Zheng;Xianghan
org:;Information and Communication Technology
adr:;;;Grimstad;;4879;Grimstad
title:PHD Studnet
tel;work:+47 3725 3441
tel;cell:+47 91664693
version:2.1
end:vcard

[3  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ is well outside Alto'ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip



_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to