Hi, On 2009-4-6, at 6:07, Bruce Lowekamp wrote:
We have the option of simpy saying "use TFRC." That will be good enough performance, and require relatively little specification since TSV has already put a lot of work into it. It's also a bit complicated. A lot more complicated than is really needed for most p2psip implementations/deployments.So the motivation of the other options was to provide simpler options that are going to provide enough performance for many/most deployments.
I'd strongly urge you to use TFRC rather than rolling your own scheme. Don't underestimate the validation effort that is required to ensure that a congestion control scheme is safe to deploy. This has all been done for TFRC, and it must be done for any new scheme.
Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
