The performance comparison draft compares the performance of a centralized lookup server with a P2P DHT system with 10M peers. Since those address entirely different use cases, and no one would ever deploy a 10M peer distributed tracker, it's not clear what the point of the comparison is. This has nothing to do with RELOAD.
Bruce On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:55 AM, World <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I am thinking what P2P Live Streaming and VoD Service can leverage P2PSIP > RELOAD. According to some research or proposal report, it seems that P2PSIP > RELOAD can be used in P2P-based Tracker and/or chunk description > distribution (chunk discovery) at the full distributed deployment. Both > P2P-based Tracker and chunk description distribution over P2PSIP overlay > were evaluated in performance referred to > draft-chen-ppsp-dht-chunk-discovery-evaluation-00.txt and > draft-hu-ppsp-tracker-dht-performance-comparison-01.txt. The result showed > the performance of DHT-based Tracker and chunk description distribution is > worse, even not acceptable for P2P Live Streaming and VoD Service. > > So can we make such conclusion that P2PSIP RELOAD is not suitable to be > leverage for both P2P Live Streaming and VoD Service in case a full > distributed deployment is not mandatory? What do you think? > > Any comments are welcome. Thanks. > > BR, > Jeffrey > > > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > >
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
