On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Vadym Chepkov <vchep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra <shravan.mis...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker >>> 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. >> >> Have a read of: >> >> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series >> >> I would recommend 1.1. Its what ships in SLES11 and RHEL6 >> > > But http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Releases says it's "experimental" > version, not a stable one.
I don't see the word "experimental" anywhere on that page ;-) > Is this page outdated then? Some of the information in that blog entry should probably make its way back into the Release page, but its not horribly incorrect. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
