On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis >> <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi >>>> <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra >>>> > <shravan.mis...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew >>>> > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions >>>> > of mine... >>>> > >>>> > See in particular: >>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html >>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html >>>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html >>>> > >>>> > I think they are still valid... >>>> >>>> Absolutely. These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then >>>> they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-) >>> >>> I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2 >>> schema, mentioned here >>> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series >>> >>> Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 >>> schema? >>> Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it >> >> cibadmin -Ql | grep validate >> > > > [r...@node-01 ~]# cibadmin -Ql | grep validate > <cib validate-with="pacemaker-1.0" crm_feature_set="3.0.1" > have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="b7764e7b-0a00-4745-8d9e-6911271eefb2" > admin_epoch="0" epoch="271" num_updates="3"> > > since validate-with is set to pacemaker-1.0, I am using pacemaker-1.0 > schema, right?
Right. > So, if I upgrade to 1.1.3 and leave validate-with to pacemaker-1.0, I > will run a stable 1.1.3, but if I set to pacemaker-1.1 I will be > running a "testing|unstable" 1.1.3. You'll be enabling some unfinished features. > Have I understood it correctly? Essentially, yes. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker