On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi > <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra <shravan.mis...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. > >> > > > > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew > > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions > > of mine... > > > > See in particular: > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html > > > > I think they are still valid... > > Absolutely. These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then > they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-)
I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2 schema, mentioned here http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 schema? Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it Cheers, Pavlos _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
