Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105

--- Comment #7 from Darryl L. Pierce <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> For -2.1:
> 
> * Versioning
>   - Please don't use ".1" for release unless needed.
>     Please use just integer (and %{?dist})
>     c.f.
>    
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Versioning

I'm following the pattern lower down where point releases are mentioned.

> * Dependency between subpackage.
>   - As said before, usually dependency between subpackage must be
>      _full_ (Epoch)-Version-"Release" and isa specific (i.e.
>     Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} )

Done.

> * Directory ownership issue
>   - %{_includedir} itself is already owned by filesystem and
>     should not be owned by qpid-proton-devel.

Oops, done.

> * Enabling test suite
>   - I missed this before, however as the source tarball
>     contains tests/ directory, please do some tests
>     in %check if possible.

The tests require, ATM, a little bit of setup in order to run them. I'll take
upstream a request to make tests easier to run in the packaging environment

Update SPEC:   http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qpid-proton.spec
Updated SRPM: 
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qpid-proton-0.2-2.2.fc17.src.rpm
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4796610

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RpchRQRFlG&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to