Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105

--- Comment #9 from Darryl L. Pierce <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > > * Dependency between subpackage.
> > >   - As said before, usually dependency between subpackage must be
> > >      _full_ (Epoch)-Version-"Release" and isa specific (i.e.
> > >     Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} )
> > 
> > Done.
> 
> So would you explain why you omit "release" dependency?
> (i.e. not %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} but
>  %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}))
> Omitting %release allows user to update only -devel or some other
> subpackage while not updating main package, which may result in 
> inconsistent state or malfunction (especially when both main
> package and subpackages are changed between release).

A typo, I thought I had included the -%{version} portion.

> 
> Another point I missed before:
> * %filter_setup
>  - %filter_setup is used, however no filters are actually defined,
>    so this %filter_setup should not be needed.

Removed.

Updated SPEC:  http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qpid-proton.spec
Updated SRPM: 
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qpid-proton-0.2-2.3.fc17.src.rpm
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4802573

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9hE2l9D2KV&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to