https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991639
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> --- > remove unwanted .mo file (don't know how to use %search_lang > while packaging simultaneously for Python2 qnd Python3.) You could have asked. ;-) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_do_we_need_to_use_.25find_lang.3F One solution would be straight-forward. You've had this %find_lang %{srcname} which in the %{buildroot} contents found the message object files and created a %files list in file "%{srcname}.lang". You could simply extract lines from that file, which contain %{python_sitelib} or %{python3_sitelib} in their path to create two new lists for your two sub-packages, which to use in your %files sections instead of the original list: grep '%{python_sitelib}' %{srcname}.lang > py2%{srcname}.lang grep '%{python3_sitelib}' %{srcname}.lang > py3%{srcname}.lang > %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}/__pycache__/* > %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}/*/__pycache__/* Here you show that you do know that you can use wildcards, but in the update package you listed each and every installed file in the %files list. Wow, that came unexpected. :) The %files list for the python2 package can get as simple as: %{python_sitelib}/%{srcname}* to include everything correctly. Similarly for the python3 based subpackage. You didn't tell why you don't include the __pycache__ directory, btw. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ioxUzIFUmU&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
