https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402



--- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn <tim.f...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5)
> (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #4)
> > 
> > > - doc sub-package isn't noarch
> > > 
> > 
> > I didn't specify it as such?
> 
> I don't see any 'BuildArch: noarch' line...
> 

OK I'll have that fixed in the next build - sorry, I misread this the first
time.

> > 
> > New files:
> > 
> > spec: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nOW9XWXZwNzhEY1U
> > srpm: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nT2FJQjlhYXVTdDA
> 
> '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' and 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' are used for epel5 only.
> 

Is the %if 0%{?rhel} not sufficient around these statements?  Or should it just
be removed all together?

> Why coot-1.spec ?
> SPEC file must have same name of src-rpm.

Doh, silly google drive renaming.  I'll fix in the next upload.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to