https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #67 from Michal Vala <mv...@redhat.com> --- > > Imho except .build-id, license, which should be GPL2 [do we wont "with > classpath exception"?] (javafxpackager BSD) and java/java-devel + self > requires we are done here. Can you publish one more spec+srpm (eventually > also with scratch) which we can test? > .build-id is clarified by Fabio Valentini and self requires seems to be correct in latest state. Jonny: Can you please add requires java/java-devel and I suggest licenses as GPL2 with classpath exception + BSD for fxpackager? If no-one has any other comments and you include these changes, I'll approve this review. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
