https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #72 from Jonny Heggheim <heg...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michal Vala from comment #67) > .build-id is clarified by Fabio Valentini and self requires seems to be > correct in latest state. > > Jonny: Can you please add requires java/java-devel and I suggest licenses as > GPL2 with classpath exception + BSD for fxpackager? > > If no-one has any other comments and you include these changes, I'll approve > this review. > > Thanks! Great, I have uploaded a new version with requires on java/java-devel + updated license. I will have a look at the comment #68 from Gil and see if I am able to use %mvn_install/%mvn_file. I also noticed there is a new version. Spec URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/openjfx.spec SRPM URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/openjfx-8.0.152-9.b03.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
