https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #68 from gil cattaneo <punto...@libero.it> --- (In reply to Michal Vala from comment #67) > > > > Imho except .build-id, license, which should be GPL2 [do we wont "with > > classpath exception"?] (javafxpackager BSD) and java/java-devel + self > > requires we are done here. Can you publish one more spec+srpm (eventually > > also with scratch) which we can test? > > > > .build-id is clarified by Fabio Valentini and self requires seems to be > correct in latest state. > > Jonny: Can you please add requires java/java-devel and I suggest licenses as > GPL2 with classpath exception + BSD for fxpackager? > > If no-one has any other comments and you include these changes, I'll approve > this review. > > Thanks! You should/must use the "%mvn_install" macro https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/index.html#gradle e.g. %mvn_install -J build/sdk/docs/api see https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/index.html#mvn_file to configure the proper JARs install location. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
