https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538658

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |zbys...@in.waw.pl
           Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org    |zbys...@in.waw.pl



--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> ---
I'll take the review.

> %global sum Python library to load and dump configuration files in various 
> formats
Using normal Summary: and then %summary subsequently saves one line ;)

> %global debug_package %{nil}
That looks suspicious. Why do you need this?
Package builds fine without it.

> %{__rm}
Eh, using a macro here is entirely pointless. It just makes the commands harder
to read (and longer). The guidelines say that macros should be used for some
*directories* [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros], but
even that makes little sense nowadays.

> https://github.com/ssato/%{name}
I know people love macros, but this makes it impossible to just click on this
and open it in a browser… It's a matter of preference, but I don't see the
advantage of using a macro here.

> Source0:        %{url}/archive/RELEASE-%{version}.tar.gz
This should be ...RELEASE_{%version}...

> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Not necessary in Fedora and somewhat recent RHEL.

- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
  (~1MB) or number of files.
  Note: Documentation size is 2662400 bytes in 126 files.
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation

It'd be nice to split out a python-anyconfig-doc subpackage with the docs.


During build I see the following error:
>     import cbor
> ImportError: No module named cbor
Is some dependency missing?

and later:
> toml.py:docstring of anyconfig.backend.toml.Parser._load_from_stream_fn:6: 
> WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /builddir/build/BUILD/python-anyconfig-RELEASE_0.9.3/anyconfig/backend/xml.py:docstring
>  of anyconfig.backend.xml._tweak_ns:4: WARNING: Field list ends without a 
> blank line; unexpected unindent.
> /builddir/build/BUILD/python-anyconfig-RELEASE_0.9.3/docs/api/anyconfig.cli.rst:4:
>  WARNING: autodoc: failed to import module u'anyconfig.cli'; the following 
> exception was raised:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx/ext/autodoc.py", line 658, in 
> import_object
>     __import__(self.modname)
>   File 
> "/builddir/build/BUILD/python-anyconfig-RELEASE_0.9.3/anyconfig/cli.py", line 
> 42, in <module>
>     sys.stdout = codecs.getwriter(_ENCODING)(sys.stdout)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/codecs.py", line 1009, in getwriter
>     return lookup(encoding).streamwriter
> TypeError: lookup() argument 1 must be string, not None
> done

And now the hard part: what is the difference in behaviour or output between
anyconfig-2 and anyconfig-3?

And also (a question for upstream): why is the executable called
"anyconfig_cli" and not just "anyconfig"?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to