https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859207

Artur Iwicki <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
              Flags|needinfo?([email protected] |fedora-review+ needinfo-
                   |)                           |



--- Comment #10 from Artur Iwicki <[email protected]> ---
>> ===== EXTRA items =====
>> 
>> Generic:
>> [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
>
>I'm not sure what does it mean - I uploaded the srpm which is created by 
>'fedpkg --release f32 local'. Is it really different?
Oh, sorry, I missed that. I had to re-build the package locally with
"BuildRequires: annobin" and I passed that SRPM to fedora-review. The provided
spec name is ok.

The latest spec and SRPM look fine to me. Approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to