https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- No, the license of the upstream code must be reflected in the Fedora package: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_basic_policy In particular: "The spec file License: field consists of an enumeration of all licenses covering any code or other material contained in the corresponding binary RPM." The new Legal guidelines are still a bit lacking in some regards, but the general Packaging Guidelines have a section about license files, which applies to this situation: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
