https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820
--- Comment #21 from Tim Flink <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #20) > Regarding libomp, we can make another metapackage if that's ok with you. > > I'd prefer more hipcc related metapackages than maintaining llvm version in > multiple specs That works for me, I have no desire to have the llvm version recorded in more places than it needs to be; it's going to cause problems at some point. I only suggested putting it back in for test only because I'm not sure if anything else uses libomp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202295820%23c21 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
