https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820



--- Comment #22 from Tom Rix <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #20)
> I noticed you dropped the extra-tools package, is this on purpose?
It did not exist as of this morning, i went ahead without it and it seems to
work ok.

> 
> Regarding libomp, we can make another metapackage if that's ok with you.
> 
> I'd prefer more hipcc related metapackages than maintaining llvm version in
> multiple specs

libomp and all the compat vs normal clang things should be done all in one
place, imo hipcc.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202295820%23c22

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to