https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820



--- Comment #23 from Tom Rix <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Tim Flink from comment #19)
> Created attachment 2041182 [details]
> specfile changes for discussion
> 
> I've attached an initial patch for the hipblaslt specfile that contains a
> few things, three are pretty minor:
> 
> 1. I changed a few of the BuildRequires to use pkgconfig where appropriate
Can you explain (likely again) why pkgconfig ?  I would prefer to keep the
BuildRequires as-is unless there is a MUST item somewhere you can point to.

> 2. I added a different way to disable the rpath check disable when building
> --with test that works with mock. I'd like to have this in all of the rocm
> packages that have -test subpackages to make building them easier but this
> can wait for a more general discussion, it doesn't have to be added now if
> there are objections.

Having a mockable set of -test subpackages is generally good, then we can talk
about getting them into the distro.  Did you want to do this for the set ?

> 3. I added some missing deps from the -test subpackage
> 

I'll add these if there is another revision, but these would fall out of #2 if
you wanted to do #2.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202295820%23c23

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to