https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2437502
--- Comment #77 from Nicola Taibi <[email protected]> --- C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "Unknown or generated", "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 and/or GNU General Public License, Version 3", "GNU General Public License, Version 3". 59 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/spacegl/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 310665 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in spacegl- data [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: spacegl-2026.02.09-16.fc45.x86_64.rpm spacegl-data-2026.02.09-16.fc45.noarch.rpm spacegl-2026.02.09-16.fc45.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpm90im00b')] checks: 32, packages: 3 spacegl.spec: W: specfile-warning sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory spacegl.spec: W: specfile-warning sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory spacegl.spec: W: specfile-warning sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory spacegl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spacegl-client spacegl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spacegl-server spacegl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spacegl_3dview spacegl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spacegl_client spacegl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spacegl_server spacegl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spacegl_viewer spacegl-data.noarch: W: no-documentation spacegl.spec:105: W: macro-in-%changelog %{rel} 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings, 14 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 3.6 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: spacegl-debuginfo-2026.02.09-16.fc45.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmppfyzd2ms')] checks: 32, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 16 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- (none): E: there is no installed rpm "spacegl". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "spacegl-debuginfo". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "spacegl-data". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 3 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/nicolataibi/spacegl/archive/refs/tags/2026.02.09-16.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 446ceb0057cd5391f70610a457d847a3a760f0f2a0dcbb2c0743c5928b4aec9e CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 446ceb0057cd5391f70610a457d847a3a760f0f2a0dcbb2c0743c5928b4aec9e Requires -------- spacegl (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/bash freeglut glew libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLEW.so.2.2()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.3()(64bit) libcrypto.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.0)(64bit) libglut.so.3()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) mesa-libGL mesa-libGLU openssl rtld(GNU_HASH) spacegl-data spacegl-data (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): spacegl Provides -------- spacegl: application() application(spacegl.desktop) spacegl spacegl(x86-64) spacegl-data: spacegl-data Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name spacegl --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: R, SugarActivity, PHP, fonts, Ocaml, Java, Python, Haskell, Perl Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH - F7 - Anisotropic Filtering: Improves the sharpness of slanted surfaces (cycles through 1x, 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x). - F8 - Starfield Density: Changes the number of background stars (from 1,000 to 8,000). Useful for making space feel denser or reducing the load on the GPU. - Multi-Tube Independent Logic: The system now supports firing up to four torpedoes in rapid succession. - Cyclic Reload HUD: The [L] (Loading) status is now correctly displayed for each individual tube. - Boundary Enforcement: Torpedoes now explode immediately upon reaching quadrant boundaries. - Universal Visibility: Torpedoes from all players are now rendered in everyone's 3D view (Object Type 28). - Optimized HUD: Personal HUD indicators accurately track your own torpedoes, while the 3D view displays all tactical ordnance without cluttering the screen with unnecessary labels. - Quadrants: 40x40x40 (64,000 quadrants).Sectors (Units): 40x40x40 per quadrant.Absolute Coordinate System: Migrated from 0-400 to 0.0-1600.0. - Vastness: The galaxy is now 64 times larger in terms of absolute unit volume, ensuring superior fluidity during high-speed movement. - All navigation commands (nav, imp, apr) and calculators (cal, ical) now operate with hundredth-degree precision (%.2f). - Short-Range Sensors (srs) and status reports (sta) now display coordinates and distances with two decimal places. - Hyperdrive Recalibration: Warp Factor 9.9 traverses the galaxy's diagonal ($\approx 2771$ units) in 40 real-world seconds. - HUD ETA: Added a yellow field in the 3D viewer that displays the Estimated Time of Arrival in seconds; this is only visible when a destination is set. - Tactical Cube: The quadrant frame has been scaled to $40 \times 40 \times 40$.Tactical Grid: Now covers the entire sector volume with reference lines every 10 units. - Precision has been increased to "millimeter" level, with a stopping tolerance of 0.01 units (ten times more precise). This is critical for docking and boarding maneuvers. - Full HD (**1920x1080**) support via `TACTICAL_CUBE_W/H` macros. The game is now feature-complete and stable (~99%). Ready for final technical review. Release 16. With kind regards, Nick Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ntaibi/space-gl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10153706-spacegl/spacegl.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ntaibi/space-gl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10153706-spacegl/spacegl-2026.02.09-16.fc45.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2437502 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202437502%23c77 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
