https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2499516

Cristian Le <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
              Flags|                            |needinfo?([email protected])



--- Comment #9 from Cristian Le <[email protected]> ---
> The code built with `--with-extra-only`, including `fm-xml-file.c` and the 
> installed public headers, is explicitly licensed under `LGPL-2.1-or-later`.

:+1: And it's not that that upstream *should* provide the license file, they
*must* provide it. We can take the liberty here to add the license file in
downstream until upstream accepts the patch to include it.

Tip for @[email protected], run locally `fedora-review -b 2499516` and you will
get the full license-review breakdown (the one mentioned in the review
template). It may not catch all license texts and it often misinterprets
license, but it can give you a good head start for checking if the project has
differently license files. Common things you should manually verify are test
data providence and pre-compiled binaries.

Other 2 points, yes :+1:. The dir one is not that pressing if nothing else is
expected to co-own the directory (don't remember if it would leave
`%{_includedir}/libfm-1.0` folder upon uninstall though).

Some extra review points:
- One thing suspicious is why is `--disable-static` not sufficient and you have
to do a `find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la'`?
- Can you manually do `autoreconf` instead of the `autogen.sh`?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2499516

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202499516%23c9

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to