On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:04:08AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> My point is that it's not really clear ? to me ? that that's the best
> (or most practical) choice. I'd like to hear from Patrick and Emmanuel.

My two cents: the canonicalway of releasing software is to run
autotools on it before releasing so that reelased tarball contains 
no autotools-related dependency.

I am not sure of what happened with config.sub here, but we are lucky
since we can just add it as empty file as a second best solution.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Reply via email to