Am 23.05.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Emmanuel Dreyfus:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:04:08AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> My point is that it's not really clear ? to me ? that that's the best
>> (or most practical) choice. I'd like to hear from Patrick and Emmanuel.
> My two cents: the canonicalway of releasing software is to run
> autotools on it before releasing so that reelased tarball contains
> no autotools-related dependency.
Acknowledge
>
> I am not sure of what happened with config.sub here, but we are lucky
> since we can just add it as empty file as a second best solution.
>
I had to check on our Debian builds if it runs w/o problems on all ports
with an empty file, if not I would prefer updates of config.{sub,guess}
from time to time to support new ports.
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
*/
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
