I guess I am okay with this. I will let the others also express their
opinions about this...

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Amye Scavarda <a...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
> pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We've tagged and released glusterfs-3.9rc1. This is the 1st Release
>> Candidate for GlusterFS 3.9.0.
>>
>>  https://build.gluster.org/job/release/171/console
>> http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.9rc1.tar.gz
>>
>> The release-notes still need some work for a GA release:
>>   https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.9/doc/
>> release-notes/3.9.0.md
>>
>> Once we have some useful release-notes, we can send out a notification
>> to the users list and other more public channels.
>>
>> Packages for CentOS-7 are available from the Community Build System:
>> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111151
>>
>> Other distributions may want to verify their packaging too.
>>
>> The current plan is to release 3.9.0 in the first few days of October.
>>
>> I'm going to strongly suggest that we not do this the first few days of
> October, let's plan a release after Gluster Developer Summit. A great many
> of the community will be traveling, and we have a great opportunity to test
> further with a lot of us in the same room.
>
> Mid-October instead?
>
> -- amye
>
> Please let us know the results of tests in the checklist you already
>> created at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-chec
>> klist for your components.
>>
>> --
>> Pranith
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Amye Scavarda | a...@redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead
>



-- 
Pranith
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list
packaging@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Reply via email to