I guess I am okay with this. I will let the others also express their opinions about this...
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Amye Scavarda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We've tagged and released glusterfs-3.9rc1. This is the 1st Release >> Candidate for GlusterFS 3.9.0. >> >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release/171/console >> http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.9rc1.tar.gz >> >> The release-notes still need some work for a GA release: >> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.9/doc/ >> release-notes/3.9.0.md >> >> Once we have some useful release-notes, we can send out a notification >> to the users list and other more public channels. >> >> Packages for CentOS-7 are available from the Community Build System: >> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111151 >> >> Other distributions may want to verify their packaging too. >> >> The current plan is to release 3.9.0 in the first few days of October. >> >> I'm going to strongly suggest that we not do this the first few days of > October, let's plan a release after Gluster Developer Summit. A great many > of the community will be traveling, and we have a great opportunity to test > further with a lot of us in the same room. > > Mid-October instead? > > -- amye > > Please let us know the results of tests in the checklist you already >> created at https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-chec >> klist for your components. >> >> -- >> Pranith >> > > > > -- > Amye Scavarda | [email protected] | Gluster Community Lead > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ packaging mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
