On 09/23/2016 01:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > <top post> > If there's another RC, please follow the naming convention that we > agreed on in the dim, distant past of 3.9.0rcX. > > Note the .0 in there. > > 3.9rcX (without the .0) is mildly annoying from a packaging perspective. > > And be sure that the GA is tagged and released as 3.9.0. > > We do have a history of using both 3.9rcX and 3.9.0rcX in the past. But > please stick to the One True convention of 3.9.0rcX. > > > We tried to keep it as close as possible to 3.8 > v3.8rc0 > v3.8rc1 > v3.8rc2 > v3.9rc0 > v3.9rc1 > ... >
Yes, that was annoying then too. > Do you want this to be changed in future? Yes please. -- Kaleb _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
