On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <[email protected]> wrote:
> <top post> > If there's another RC, please follow the naming convention that we > agreed on in the dim, distant past of 3.9.0rcX. > > Note the .0 in there. > > 3.9rcX (without the .0) is mildly annoying from a packaging perspective. > > And be sure that the GA is tagged and released as 3.9.0. > > We do have a history of using both 3.9rcX and 3.9.0rcX in the past. But > please stick to the One True convention of 3.9.0rcX. > We tried to keep it as close as possible to 3.8 v3.8rc0 v3.8rc1 v3.8rc2 v3.9rc0 v3.9rc1 ... Do you want this to be changed in future? > > Thanks. > > </top post> > > > > On 09/22/2016 09:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We've tagged and released glusterfs-3.9rc1. This is the 1st Release > > Candidate for GlusterFS 3.9.0. > > > > https://build.gluster.org/job/release/171/console > > http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/ > glusterfs-3.9rc1.tar.gz > > > > The release-notes still need some work for a GA release: > > > > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.9/ > doc/release-notes/3.9.0.md > > > > Once we have some useful release-notes, we can send out a notification > > to the users list and other more public channels. > > > > Packages for CentOS-7 are available from the Community Build System: > > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111151 > > > > Other distributions may want to verify their packaging too. > > > > The current plan is to release 3.9.0 in the first few days of October. > > > > Please let us know the results of tests in the checklist you already > > created at > > https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist for > > your components. > > > > -- > > Pranith > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > packaging mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging > > > > -- > > Kaleb > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ packaging mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
