Hello Garcia,

it looks that you can do it this way:
https://makandracards.com/makandra/1717-git-change-author-of-a-commit

Regards

Fabrice


Le 2021-03-18 à 08 h 52, Diego Garcia del Rio a écrit :
Hi Fabrice,

Thanks for the feedback. I dont know if you can force-skip the cla-bot check. After all the commit was just pulling in upstream changes... so if we can merge as-is, im fine with that. After all, its basically a no-op commit.

Cheers!


On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:03 AM Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>> wrote:

    Hello Diego,

    your PR is really appreciate !!

    I did a quick check and i am not sure i can do something on my
    side to fix the CLA-Bot since it's in your repo.

    The 2 things i see are that
    
https://docs.github.com/en/github/committing-changes-to-your-project/why-are-my-commits-linked-to-the-wrong-user#commits-are-not-linked-to-any-user
    
<https://docs.github.com/en/github/committing-changes-to-your-project/why-are-my-commits-linked-to-the-wrong-user#commits-are-not-linked-to-any-user>
    or merge it as is.

    I will ask my coworker tomorrow.

    Regards

    Fabrice



    The other way can maybe to recreate a PR

    Le 21-03-16 à 19 h 31, Diego Garcia del Rio a écrit :
    Hello everyone,

    I have a PR open since around a month now where I added better
    support for the different authentication mechanisms that ruckus
    offers, as well as quite a bit of documentation on how to use the
    RBAC (role-based assigning of ACLs and rate limits) when using
    both smartzone and zoneDirector controllers for ruckus,

    I also cleaned up the webService API calls done to the ruckus
    controller so as to support both HTTP and HTTPS with their
    corresponding ports (http so as to allow for easier
    troubleshooting when things arent working). I also added support
    for the "username" in the API call which is mandatory if using
    SmartZone in multi-tenant mode (and I guess it should make this
    compatible with ruckus cloud )

    In particular, ruckus has so many different modes of operation
    (radius local vs proxy-radius with and without WISPR portal on
    the AP) that things are bound to get confusing. For example, if
    you're using a remove SmartZone controller, while having
    packetfence locally installed on-prem, the proxy mode for RADIUS
    might not be workable as you would have to open port 1812 on your
    external connection (and you might not even have a static ip!) So
    in those cases, while authentication is done through radius, the
    de-auth is done through http/rest API. I added support for
    forcing the de-auth method if needed and have been testing it
    succesfully lately.

    I  noticed there is ongoing work for DPSK support for ruckus and
    I have already integrated those changes in my PR but I havent
    been able to test them yet.

    my PR is available here:
    https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/6141
    <https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/6141>

    The only issue I have is that when pulling the upstream changes
    to the whole trunk, I accidentally kept one commit as "root"
    rather than "garci66" so the CLA-Bot is complaining... if someone
    has an "easy"  idea on how to fix that.. I'd REALLY appreciate it.

    I can imagine things are quite busy with inverse being acquired
    but I would really appreciate if anyone has some cycles to take a
    look -and ideally approve- the PR.

    I have access to a lot of ruckus gear and can help test /
    troubleshoot more complex scenarios if needed.


    Best Regards,
    Diego




    _______________________________________________
    PacketFence-devel mailing list
    PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net  
<mailto:PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel  
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel>
    _______________________________________________
    PacketFence-devel mailing list
    PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel
    <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel>



_______________________________________________
PacketFence-devel mailing list
PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel

--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-devel mailing list
PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel

Reply via email to