perfect, i will review it soon.

Thanks


Le 2021-03-18 à 13 h 33, Diego Garcia del Rio a écrit :
Hi Fabrice,

I gave up and built a new branch:

https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/6201 <https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/6201>

I closed the previous PR. This one should have the same changes but collapsed in fewer commits (and all under my name)

Cheers!


On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:08 PM Fabrice Durand <fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>> wrote:

    Hello Garcia,

    it looks that you can do it this way:
    https://makandracards.com/makandra/1717-git-change-author-of-a-commit
    <https://makandracards.com/makandra/1717-git-change-author-of-a-commit>

    Regards

    Fabrice


    Le 2021-03-18 à 08 h 52, Diego Garcia del Rio a écrit :
    Hi Fabrice,

    Thanks for the feedback. I dont know if you can force-skip the
    cla-bot check. After all the commit was just pulling in upstream
    changes... so if we can merge as-is, im fine with that. After
    all, its basically a no-op commit.

    Cheers!


    On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:03 AM Durand fabrice
    <fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>> wrote:

        Hello Diego,

        your PR is really appreciate !!

        I did a quick check and i am not sure i can do something on
        my side to fix the CLA-Bot since it's in your repo.

        The 2 things i see are that
        
https://docs.github.com/en/github/committing-changes-to-your-project/why-are-my-commits-linked-to-the-wrong-user#commits-are-not-linked-to-any-user
        
<https://docs.github.com/en/github/committing-changes-to-your-project/why-are-my-commits-linked-to-the-wrong-user#commits-are-not-linked-to-any-user>
        or merge it as is.

        I will ask my coworker tomorrow.

        Regards

        Fabrice



        The other way can maybe to recreate a PR

        Le 21-03-16 à 19 h 31, Diego Garcia del Rio a écrit :
        Hello everyone,

        I have a PR open since around a month now where I added
        better support for the different authentication mechanisms
        that ruckus offers, as well as quite a bit of documentation
        on how to use the RBAC (role-based assigning of ACLs and
        rate limits) when using both smartzone and zoneDirector
        controllers for ruckus,

        I also cleaned up the webService API calls done to the
        ruckus controller so as to support both HTTP and HTTPS with
        their corresponding ports (http so as to allow for easier
        troubleshooting when things arent working). I also added
        support for the "username" in the API call which is
        mandatory if using SmartZone in multi-tenant mode (and I
        guess it should make this compatible with ruckus cloud )

        In particular, ruckus has so many different modes of
        operation (radius local vs proxy-radius with and without
        WISPR portal on the AP) that things are bound to get
        confusing. For example, if you're using a remove SmartZone
        controller, while having packetfence locally installed
        on-prem, the proxy mode for RADIUS might not be workable as
        you would have to open port 1812 on your external connection
        (and you might not even have a static ip!) So in those
        cases, while authentication is done through radius, the
        de-auth is done through http/rest API. I added support for
        forcing the de-auth method if needed and have been testing
        it succesfully lately.

        I  noticed there is ongoing work for DPSK support for ruckus
        and I have already integrated those changes in my PR but I
        havent been able to test them yet.

        my PR is available here:
        https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/6141
        <https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/6141>

        The only issue I have is that when pulling the upstream
        changes to the whole trunk, I accidentally kept one commit
        as "root" rather than "garci66" so the CLA-Bot is
        complaining... if someone has an "easy" idea on how to fix
        that.. I'd REALLY appreciate it.

        I can imagine things are quite busy with inverse being
        acquired but I would really appreciate if anyone has some
        cycles to take a look -and ideally approve- the PR.

        I have access to a lot of ruckus gear and can help test /
        troubleshoot more complex scenarios if needed.


        Best Regards,
        Diego




        _______________________________________________
        PacketFence-devel mailing list
        PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net  
<mailto:PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel  
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel>
        _______________________________________________
        PacketFence-devel mailing list
        PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
        <mailto:PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel
        <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel>



    _______________________________________________
    PacketFence-devel mailing list
    PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net  
<mailto:PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel  
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel>

-- Fabrice Durand
    fdur...@inverse.ca  <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) 
::www.inverse.ca  <http://www.inverse.ca>
    Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu  <http://www.sogo.nu>) 
and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org  <http://packetfence.org>)

    _______________________________________________
    PacketFence-devel mailing list
    PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel
    <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel>



_______________________________________________
PacketFence-devel mailing list
PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel

--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-devel mailing list
PacketFence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel

Reply via email to