Hi Kevin, On 25/07/11 12:47 PM, Kevin Manuel wrote: > Hi, > > Has there been any progress with this issue? We have been receiving an > increasing number of occurrences of "invalid" snmptraps as new computers are > added to our network and it is becoming a real headache.
Not at this point.. I asked the net-snmp folks on IRC about what we *should* do and the answer was: rewrite all your regexp to handle both cases (HEX-STRING and STRING variants). Of course I didn't like this idea as we don't even have the switches to still test the new regular expressions and because you guys found out others glitches to that approach.. Because of the intrusive nature of the change I'm thinking about switching the tail-like back-end of pfsetvlan maybe into a snmptrapd perl extension but then again maybe not... Now, we are focused on 3.0 (which won't have this fix) then we have a large backlog of hardware to support so I might suggest you try to modify the regexp in your own modules with what is mentioned in the ticket (with additional fixes required that you guys found out about). I'm sorry it's just not a priority for the time being.. but we'll get to it don't worry. Regards, > [...] > > Ze ticket: >> http://www.packetfence.org/bugs/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=1098 -- Olivier Bilodeau [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 *115 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 _______________________________________________ Packetfence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
