Hello all!

Issues:

#1: Guest SMS not working
My guests were not able to use the SMS auth, they were getting an apache page 
about a software error.

Software Error:
Not a HASH reference at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/web/guest.pm line 189.

As of 4.0.5-2, this is now fixed for my system

#2: Guest EMail registration
When a guest clicked on the link in the email PF sent to them to enable their 
24 hour access the user received a 403 Forbidden page.

I used the info from the list archives to allow other subnets other than 
registration subnets to access the portal.  This fixes the issue but it is kind 
of a hack.
Here is the link to the email:  
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29684676

This issue is "fixed", but could be borked by an update.  A permanent fix for 
email guest access for vlan deployments should probably be found. My question 
is; is it necessarily a bad thing that I allowed other subnets to access the 
portal?  If it is not, then it seems an easy fix would be to remove the routed 
subnets check, but there may be issues with this that I cannot see at this 
moment.

#3: IPTables blocking critical ports
When IPTables is running only port 22 seems to be available.

For now I am simply shutting down IPTables to work around this.

I have setup a testbed that I can use to test patches so I can further 
troubleshoot this issue.  I plan to look into this further in the morning.  It 
was suggested by xenophage to post the output of iptables -L -n -x.  I will do 
this ASAP.

#4: Gaming device registration page
Users can reach the gaming registration page, fill out the form, and click 
register.  Once they submit the form they are dumped back to the gaming 
register login page with no feedback.  No lines show up in the log even when 
logging is set to "TRACE".

As of now there we do not have a workaround for this and 4.0.5-2 does not solve 
this issue.

I feel I should say that although the growing pains of moving from the 3.X 
series into the 4.X series have been rather public and seemingly many; I 
believe that this should be expected. It is my understanding that PFv4 was 
almost a complete re-rewrite of the core code and modules.  If this is true 
then, as a cracker-jack programmer myself, I find amazing the stability of what 
is very nearly a 0.X release of software.  I would like to say thank you to the 
community for all of your feedback and especially a sincere thank you to 
Inverse for being so incredibly responsive in pushing out patches to address 
our issues and for their continued presence on this list.

I look forward to ironing out the issues and contributing in anyway I can to 
our community.

Gentlemen, good evening.

Jake Sallee
Godfather of Bandwidth
System Engineer
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor

900 College St.
Belton, Texas
76513

Fone: 254-295-4658
Phax: 254-295-4221

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to