Dear Users,
Any updates :(
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:13 PM, sampath jayashantha <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi sallee,
>
> This one ? Help with Cisco 2960 and
> 1242<http://sourceforge.net/p/packetfence/mailman/message/29744760>
>
> Regards,
> Sampath
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Sallee, Jake <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Search for my name and 2960 in the archives, I posted the necessary
>> config bits to make PF work with MAB on just about any cisco switch.
>>
>> Jake Sallee
>> Godfather of Bandwidth
>> System Engineer
>> University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
>>
>> 900 College St.
>> Belton, Texas
>> 76513
>>
>> Fone: 254-295-4658
>> Phax: 254-295-4221
>> ________________________________
>> From: sampath jayashantha [[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 9:24 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Adding switch to packet fence,
>>
>> Dear Jason,
>>
>> I just followed the packet fence device configuration guide to
>> configure the switch. I can see there are lot of methods like, telnet, ssh,
>> snmp, radius etc on packet fence switch add GUI. But i'm little bit confuse
>> with those options Which are how to relate to each other. :(
>> To make packet fence up and running with a vary basic configuration
>> could you please tell me which configuration i need to do in switch side
>> and the packet fence side.
>> Same time what is the different between port-security method and
>> full 802.1x with RADIUS de-auth. Little bit confused with those
>> terminologies.
>> And what will be the role for SNMP traps ? What is actually does ?
>>
>> Note:
>> No need to explain in a very detail manner. Just briefing will be enough
>> to find the right path for me.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sampath
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Jason Frisvold <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> sampath jayashantha wrote:
>> > Hi fellow people,
>> >
>> > After getting tired with old cisco 2950 old switch i found a new switch
>> > 2960 as my new packet fence switch. I have completed the switch
>> > configuration according to the support document. But the problem is when
>> > i plug in a device to switch port 4 nothing happen. I cant see any event
>> > on switch and packet fence side logs.
>>
>> Any particular reason you're using the port-security method? The 2960
>> is fully capable of full 802.1x with RADIUS de-auth.
>>
>> For your current configuration, you need to make sure that traps from
>> the switch are making it to the server. Is iptables on the packetfence
>> server open for incoming 162/udp connections? Did you restart radiusd
>> after adding the new switch config?
>>
>> > Am i missing anything ?
>>
>> --
>> ---------------------------
>> Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> ---------------------------
>>
>> "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.\"
>> - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to
>> Perforce.
>> With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
>> Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and
>> the
>> freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ..........................................................................................
>>
>> There is always some one who know more Than us out there.
>>
>> Wê Lïvê †ð §hårê : Wê Lðvê †ð §hårê
>>
>>
>>
>> SAM
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to
>> Perforce.
>> With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
>> Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and
>> the
>> freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ..........................................................................................
>
> There is always some one who know more Than us out there.
>
> Wê Lïvê †ð §hårê : Wê Lðvê †ð §hårê
>
>
>
> SAM
>
--
..........................................................................................
There is always some one who know more Than us out there.
Wê Lïvê †ð §hårê : Wê Lðvê †ð §hårê
SAM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
