Hi Nicholas and Sajawal, Thank you for attempting to help.
Apparently I missed the type of the interface, which should have been assigned to management. This is a bit misleading and confusing. The IP address assigned to the appliance without all roles is for management purposes indeed. What’s the point of setting it to management type ? Also, I selected RADIUS role at the first page because without any roles the installation script doesn’t allow me to go ahead. Would it mean that RADIUS daemon will use the same IP address as was assigned to the appliance management ? Eugene From: Nicholas Pier <09np...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2019 8:34 AM To: E.P. <ype...@gmail.com> Cc: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 9.0.1 initial setup is stuck on database page Eugene, I don't know exactly where the setup logs to. Perhaps packetfence.log ? It might be worthwhile to watch the file sizes of the /usr/local/pf/logs directory to see which file's sizes are growing during installation or just "tail" them. Perhaps one can lead you towards a cause? That said, have you tried re-deploying with a fresh appliance? I don't think this is typical behaviour. tcp/1443 should be the ssl-protected webpage where you're doing setup currently and ultimately administration of the solution. Packetfence doesn't start most of its processes until the final setup of setup. So, I wouldn't expect to see radius, https on 443 and other ports yet. Nicholas P. Pier Network & Virtualization Engineer CCNP RS, PCSNSE7, VCIX6-DCV, VCIX6-NV On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 12:18 AM E.P. <ype...@gmail.com <mailto:ype...@gmail.com> > wrote: Moreover, after few minutes the page stopped responding entirely. I would assume that if something goes wrong with database parameters setup it is not a condition of the initial setup script to make PF not to respond. I see port 1443 is open in the system while running “netstat” and it is used by httpd process. Any logs that would be indicative and useful to understand what makes it not complete the setup ? Eugene From: Nicholas Pier <09np...@gmail.com <mailto:09np...@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2019 5:53 PM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: E.P. <ype...@gmail.com <mailto:ype...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 9.0.1 initial setup is stuck on database page Hey Eugene, Yes, your email is making the users mailing list. I haven't been able to reproduce your problem in any recent installations of the Zen appliance. Can you confirm that you set the root password, created the pf database tables, and set the pf user credentials before proceeding? In the past, I've been stuck by not re-entering the root user's password after setting it to something other than the default "blank" password. This prevented me from completing the following steps. Could you provide some insight as to what OS, and browser you're using? Context would be helpful. Nicholas P. Pier Network & Virtualization Engineer CCNP RS, PCSNSE7, VCIX6-DCV, VCIX6-NV On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 7:45 PM E.P. via PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > wrote: I would appreciate if anyone reply and confirm that this email is making it to packetfence users list Eugene From: E.P. <ype...@gmail.com <mailto:ype...@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2019 12:11 PM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: PF 9.0.1 initial setup is stuck on database page Hey guys, Maybe I’m special or it is a bad witchcraft on me. After a long time I got back to Packetfence as we still need to secure Ubiquiti Unifi WiFi with dot1x via RADIUS Well, trying to install zero effort appliance and stuck at the initial pages after creating database user. Clicking on “Continue” button doesn’t move it ahead. Opening the same page, namely https://172.16.0.223:1443/configurator/database in the other browser window doesn’t even fetch the page. The VM seems to be online and I can access it via SSH. What is wrong ? Eugene _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
