On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When a package A requires a package B at runtime, but B is not
> needed for building A or B cannot be installed while A is being
> built, rundepends=('B') can be used to add B to A's dependencies,
> omitting the dependency check at built time.
> ---
> scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> index c45d7e8..c809498 100644
> --- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> +++ b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
> @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ create_package() {
> for it in "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; do
> echo "group = $it" >>.PKGINFO
> done
> - for it in "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; do
> + for it in "[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]"; do
> echo "depend = $it" >>.PKGINFO
> done
> for it in "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; do
> @@ -1287,7 +1287,7 @@ fi
>
> unset pkgname pkgver pkgrel pkgdesc url license groups provides md5sums
> unset replaces depends conflicts backup source install build makedepends
> -unset optdepends options noextract
> +unset optdepends options noextract rundepends
>
> if [ ! -f "$BUILDSCRIPT" ]; then
> error "$(gettext "%s does not exist.")" "$BUILDSCRIPT"
> --
I've been contemplating something like this for a while as well. What
do others on the list think, is this getting to be too much, or does
this make sense? I think I would be fine with it. We will need
documentation (namely PKGBUILD.5.txt) to be patched as well in the
final patch.
-Dan
_______________________________________________
pacman-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
