Miklos Vajna schrieb:
I've been contemplating something like this for a while as well. What do others on the list think, is this getting to be too much, or does this make sense? I think I would be fine with it. We will need documentation (namely PKGBUILD.5.txt) to be patched as well in the final patch.
Didn't think of that.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/2891 Aaron closed this as "Wont't implement" two years ago.
It is a good feature for a packager. I am doing some packages where I always have to build with -d, as some of the dependencies are never present at build time. However, I still want makepkg to check whether all other dependencies are there.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
