On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 01:11:11PM -0500, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been contemplating something like this for a while as well. What > do others on the list think, is this getting to be too much, or does > this make sense? I think I would be fine with it. We will need > documentation (namely PKGBUILD.5.txt) to be patched as well in the > final patch.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/2891 Aaron closed this as "Wont't implement" two years ago.
pgpt94orwpPq0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
