On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Xavier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: >> Any blockers or objections to going with what we pretty much have >> right now? We'll need a (short) translation period of course as we >> updated and added some messages, but I can't think of much else. >> > > One objection : someone (probably me) should actually update one > translation to check everything is fine before any translation period, > even minor ones. > Many times I detected some problems while translating after the string > freeze, and it was obviously too late to fix. > So if this could be done systematically, it would be perfect :)
In the right directories, of course: make pacman.pot-update make libalpm.pot-update Then I think you can just run make and it will regen the po files as well? -Dan
