On 25/04/10 00:13, Nagy Gabor wrote:
Any other points/concerns people want to mention?
Allan
One more thing I want to mention: "pacman -S group" interactive versus
non-interactive behaviour. Details:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-March/010516.html
This is probably a "regression" that we should fix. Has anyone looked
at bringing the group selection interactivity into the pacman frontend
now the main package group handling is done in the backend? I can see
this not being the smallest of patches so it would be good to get one
sooner rather than later.
Allan
