On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25/04/10 00:59, Nagy Gabor wrote: >>> >>> On 24/04/10 02:04, Nagy Gabor wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Any other points/concerns people want to mention? >>>> >>>> The phonon/qt issue: >>>> >>>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010429.html >>>> >>>> And I revoke my reply. :-) Xavier and I discussed this issue on irc, >>>> and neither of us could come up with a perfect solution. So we should >>>> discuss what to do. >>>> >>> >>> Given there is no patch or idea how to patch yet, lets not make this a >>> blocker... :) >> >> You should open the link I gave. :-P >> >> That patch should fix sync405.py pactest (that I've just sent to this >> ML), including all -Su related problems, so that should cover the most >> "real" issues. The second pactest is tricky, and that seems quite hard >> to fix without notable slow-down (there the new qt is pulled by an other >> package; this cannot happen with -Su). >> >> So I think we should just accept that patch with minor modifications. >> Xavier? > > Ah... I skimmed over your "I revoke my reply" comment. :P > > That patch (with the needed modifications) is better than nothing so I would > be in favour of including it.
I would be too...if Xavier says yes as well. :) The pactest addition patch went in tonight so we should see this patch flip one of those to successful. -Dan
