On 09/05/10 22:46, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 04/24/2010 05:27 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 25/04/10 00:13, Nagy Gabor wrote:
Any other points/concerns people want to mention?
Allan
One more thing I want to mention: "pacman -S group" interactive versus
non-interactive behaviour. Details:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-March/010516.html
This is probably a "regression" that we should fix. Has anyone looked at
bringing the group selection interactivity into the pacman frontend now
the main package group handling is done in the backend? I can see this
not being the smallest of patches so it would be good to get one sooner
rather than later.
are we going to release without this regression to be fixed?
Nothing has been remove from the TODO list as far as I can tell. But if
there is no patch forthcoming...
