On 10/09/10 14:11 +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> To fix this, I'd like to propose the following.
> Padre moves to an odd and even version system
[...]
> I'd like to start this straight away, unless anyone has any objections
> to this mechanism.

i'm not against it - i don't really care.

however, wouldn't it make sense to move to a 3 digits after the dot? at
0.70 we have only 30 versions left before 1.00 - that's only 15 for an
even/odd versioning scheme.

so:
- 0.700 for stable
- 0.701 for dev
- 0.702 for stable

however, this has the drawback of changing the version pattern within a
major version (the 0.x "branch"), which i hate as a packager.

so i propose that we move to 1.x "branch", since padre is functional for
day to day editing. and we adopt:
- 1.000 for stable
- 1.001 for dev
- 1.002 for stable

for those that are afraid of the 1.x, remember that it does not mean the
product is finished. it means that it is working for the basic tasks we
had in mind (editing and showing the it can be done), and that we'll
continue to improve it.

==> wdyt?

jérôme
-- 
jque...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev

Reply via email to