Just mentioning: CPAN uses a _01 version number suffix for dev releases (as far as I know), what about this solution?
0.71 would be the next stable while 0.70_00 to _99 (or _999) could be unstable releases. We could use 0.7000 to 0.7099 as internal number representations for this. Regards, Sebastian Am 12.09.2010 10:44, schrieb Jerome Quelin: > On 10/09/12 17:13 +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote: >>> Doesn't the linux kernel do odd/even versioning for dev and stable? >> It does. > > it doesn't anymore, given that now everything happens in 2.6.x > > alias, you were saying that you're not afraid of bumping major, meaning > that we should keep 2 digits after the major... well, to me padre is > already worth a 1.x, but *you* say you'd rather keep 0.x for now. just > sayin' :-) > > but i don't really care, i was just pointing out the small number of > versions before 1.x. so do whatever you want, honestly i don't really > care as long as we're consistent. > > regards, > jérôme _______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
