FWIW, I'm happy to go with what ever. Not having a strong background on versioning and the effects/side effects and draw backs, I can't comment.
Doesn't the linux kernel do odd/even versioning for dev and stable? > Padre is mostly usable for day to day editing, but there's still a few > pieces that are fairly evil and need to be backgroundified. > > Perhaps we could give ourselves the next 5 releases or so to > concentrate on the things we need to do to call something a 1.0? > > For the three digit thing, do we think that we might switch to version > 2 within 50 releases of 1.0? > > I quite like the Firefox versioning system, which does a lot of > releases but isn't afraid to tag something as a new major revision > just because it didn't require a complete rewrite. > > Adam K > > On 10 September 2010 16:42, Jerome Quelin <jque...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 10/09/10 14:11 +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote: > >> To fix this, I'd like to propose the following. > >> Padre moves to an odd and even version system > > [...] > >> I'd like to start this straight away, unless anyone has any objections > >> to this mechanism. > > > > i'm not against it - i don't really care. > > > > however, wouldn't it make sense to move to a 3 digits after the dot? at > > 0.70 we have only 30 versions left before 1.00 - that's only 15 for an > > even/odd versioning scheme. > > > > so: > > - 0.700 for stable > > - 0.701 for dev > > - 0.702 for stable > > > > however, this has the drawback of changing the version pattern within a > > major version (the 0.x "branch"), which i hate as a packager. > > > > so i propose that we move to 1.x "branch", since padre is functional for > > day to day editing. and we adopt: > > - 1.000 for stable > > - 1.001 for dev > > - 1.002 for stable > > > > for those that are afraid of the 1.x, remember that it does not mean the > > product is finished. it means that it is working for the basic tasks we > > had in mind (editing and showing the it can be done), and that we'll > > continue to improve it. > > > > ==> wdyt? > > > > jérôme > > -- > > jque...@gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Padre-dev mailing list > > Padre-dev@perlide.org > > http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing list > Padre-dev@perlide.org > http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
_______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
