Yeah, I'm happy to go to 0.82 but didn't want to use up a version number for a small fix.
I've been watching irc via http://irclog.perlgeek.de/padre/today and have noticed Adam has put a few things through. Given the reports of crashing, I guess it's best to get to a more stable point with the codebase before releasing. > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Peter Lavender <pla...@internode.on.net> > wrote: > > Due to my mistake with the save as checking the file extension, we really > > need to think about getting the next padre out there. > > > > What do people think of a padre 0.80.1 ? > > Why not call it 0.82? This would keep our version scheme simple as it is. > There are already some other changes in trunk, besides your fix. > > Currently, there seem to be some other stability issues, so let's > better fix them and then release? > > Best regards, > Z. >
_______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
