On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Claudio Ramirez <padre.clau...@apt-get.be> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Gabor Szabo <szab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> In general I'd prefer keeping it as a separate plugin but having >> it included in the binary distributions and the downstream distributions. > > Well, from an user's point of view there isn't much difference between > plugin and core if: > 1. The plugin is installed and enabled by default (think dependencies). > 2. The plugin preferences are *shown* in the same menu (where there are > store is a different issue). > This is the philosophy of Netbeans Java IDE. if I recall correctly they call > them "core plugins" (they also have "third party plugins". It works for > them. > Anyway, we can do something about 2, but we I guess can not force > distributions to do 1.
There is no need to force. Some will agree with our view and distribute these plugins others will not. I guess most will. Especially if we build our binary packages ourselves :) Gabor _______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
